A set and a collection of subsets of , (called open sets) is a topogical space if:
if is an arbitrary collection of open sets, for each (where is any index set), . That is, arbitrary union of open sets, is open.
Similarly, for a finite collection of open sets , the intersection . That is, finite intersection of open sets are open.
Note: for a topological space , Saying is open is equivalent to saying . So we might simply use open sets to refer to the (sub)sets in the topology . It is important to note that the concept of "open sets" is therefore dependent on the choice of topology on . Moreover, for a point we say that is an open set around if . This is just to help write more intuitive sentences.
Neighborhood
Given a topological space , and a point , then is a neighborhood around if There is an open set around that is contained in . More formally, is a neighborhood if , where . The set of all neighborhoods of is denoted as
Limit point
let be a topological space and . then a point is a limit point of if for all neighborhoods around , has a non empty intersection with , and contains points other than . That is, for all , .
The set of all limit points of is denoted as
Closed Set
Let be a topological and . Then is closed if it contains all it's limit points. That is, .
CLOSED AND OPEN ARE NOT OPPOSITES!!!!
This is something important to keep in mind. If a set is not closed, that doesn't mean its open. And if a set is not open, it doesn't mean that it is closed. It's a weird case of English names not playing well with their co-responding math definitions.
For example, if is a topological space, then is open by definition (, However, also contains all its limit points ( contains all points!) Hence is also closed. It is both closed and open, or "clopen" (this is an actual term).
Define the standard toplogy on where the open sets are unions of open intervals . consider the set . Clearly this set is not open, as no union of open intervals or finite intersection of open intervals can result in . However, it is also not closed, as is a limit point of , but . So this is an example of a set that neither close nor open in the standard topology on .
Henceforth we may omit mentioning and simply say is a topological space, of course, , a topology of is still there.
Closure of a set
let be a topological space and . Then the closure of written is the union of with all the limit points of . That is, .
The closure of a set is closed
Let X be a topological space, and . Then is closed.
Suppose is not closed. Then there exists a point which is a limit point of but not in . Clearly, is not a limit point of . Therefore, must be a limit point of . Take any open set around . There exists some such that . This means that , which implies that is an open set around . Since is a limit point of , this also means that intersects (non-emptily and without ) with . Therefore, must be a limit point of .
The closure is the smallest containing closed set
Let be a topological space and . Then if is a closed set such that , then . That is, any closed set that contains must also contain it's closure.
Since is closed, contains all it's limit points. In particular, contains all the limit points of because contains . Therefore contains .
Denseness
If is a topological space, then is dense if . denseness of A is a nice property, because any point is either in A, or is a limit point of A.
Subspace Topology
Let be a topological space and . Then inheriting the topology , (basically taking the intersection of all open sets with ) defines a topological space . (It is left to the reader to verify that satisfies the axioms of topology)
Covers and Subcovers
Let be a topo space, and , then an open cover of ,is a collection of open sets such that .
If is also a cover of , then is a subcover of . Note: subcover simply means picking some (maybe all) elements of the cover.
Compactness
let be a topo space and . then is compact if for every open cover There exists a subcover such that the cardinality of is finite.
Metric space
a set with a distance function is a metric space if:
(only identical points have zero distance).
(symmetry of distance).
(triangle inequality).
Basis for a topology
let be a topological space. Then, a basis of this topology for every point an open set around , there exists a "basic open set" such that .
Essentially, the basis is a subcollection of open sets, such that any open set is the union of some basis elements. The elements of the basis are called basic open sets.
(B1) Since is itself an open set, for every , there exists a basic open set around .
(B2) For any two basic open sets if There exists around . (this is because the (finite) intersections of open sets are open).
In fact, if there is no topology on , but we have a collection of subsets for which (B1) and (B2) holds, Then we can generate a topology from arbitrary unions of elements of . By induction on (B2) the generated topology is stable under finite intersection, and by (B1) is part of the generated topology. And by the process of generation, the generated topology is also stable under arbitrary unions.
On convergence:
Consider a set as the domain of some set of functions, targeted towards a metric space .
The sequence of functions converges to pointwise, if for every and , there exists such that for , .
The thing about pointwise convergence on is that, the tail of the sequence that is epsilon close to at an input depends not only on epsilon but as well.
On the other hand, uniformly converges to if for any , there exists such that no matter what choice of , whenever , .
Compact convergence
let be a toplogical space, a metric space, and the set of all functions from to . A sequence of functions in converges compactly to in if for every compact subset of , the restriction of each to uniformly converges to the restriction of to . That is for any , there is such that whenever , for all , , for any compact subset .
Since the inequality holds for all , we can say that for all .
Stating the theorem compactly, for all compact ,
In some sense, We want to put a topology on You can't use 'macro parameter character #' in math mode{#X} Y such that if (that is the sequence converges to , both in as a topological space) if and only if compactly converges to .
Take any compact set , any and You can't use 'macro parameter character #' in math modef \in \ { #XY} . Define the open ball \ Basis element: $$B_C(f, \epsilon) = { g \in
Then, using to denote all compact subsets of , $$\mathscr B = \bigcup_{C \in \kappa X} \ \bigcup_{\epsilon > 0} \ \bigcup_{f \in
{ #XY}
} \ B_{C}(f,\epsilon)$$
We now have to verify that is a basis, by (B1) and (B2).
So (B1) basically states (in this context) that for each You can't use 'macro parameter character #' in math modef \in \ { #XY} there exists such that .
well, pick any compact and .
Clearly , and as .
Lemma
If and then .
proof: let , then . Rearrange and use triangle inequality to get .
let as defined in the lemma, and . It follows that and contains . ( are compact so is compact). Finally showing (B2).
Okay back to fucking reality. We have put a topology on . But what does convergence in a topological space mean?
Convergence of sequences in topological spaces
A sequence converges to (written in a topological space if for every nbhd around , there exists such that for all .
Equivalently if and only if for each basis element around there exists such that for all .
proof: if is a nbhd of , then there is an open set where . But is the union of some basis elements, one of them has to contain , call it . So it's sufficient to show that there is a tail of the sequence contained in .
But all Basis elements around are themselves nbhd's around . so it is necessary to show that there is a tail of the sequence contained in any such B.
Compact convergence topology
Let be a topological space and be a metric space. The compact convergence topology on function from to , is the one generated by the following basis set:
You can't use 'macro parameter character #' in math mode\mathscr B = \bigcup_{C \in \kappa X} \ \bigcup_{\epsilon > 0} \ \bigcup_{f \in \ { #XY} } \ B_{C}(f,\epsilon)
Where
You can't use 'macro parameter character #' in math modeB_C(f, \epsilon) = \{ g \in \ {#XY} : \sup_{x \in C} \ d(f(x),g(x)) < \epsilon\}
And in this topology on if and only if converges compactly to . This follows directly by considering any basis that contains .
We must have such that for all , equivalently, . Hence, . using the triangle inequality and properties of , we get . Notice here that is any compact set and is also arbitrary.
Alternate definition for closed sets
Let be a topological space. Then is closed if and only if is open.
Well suppose is closed, then any limit point of is in . Therefore, no point is a limit point of . Hence, for each There exists a NBHD around such that . Equivalently, There exists an open set around each such that . Hence . Hence is open (it is a union of open sets).
Now suppose is open, and (for the sake of contradiction) suppose is a limit point of . Write as a union of some collection of basis elements. By the axiom of choice, is in some But since is a limit point of , contains some point . This means that , which means that , which is a contradiction. Hence no point is a limit point of , therefore contains all its limit points ( is closed)
Note: whenever we have a definition of something, A := B iff ("def 1"), and then we also have A := B iff ("some condition") we can alternatively take that condition itself as a definition, and recover the older definition as a theorem instead. That is to say, if we define closed sets as ones that contain all their limit points, we can show the theorem: E is closed iff its complement in X is open. Dually, we can define E is closed iff its complement in X is open, and recover E is closed iff it contains all its limit points as a theorem
Continuous maps on topological spaces
let and be topological spaces. A map is a homomorphism (continuous) if for any open subset of , the pre image of , is open in , that is (note that since is always open in any topology, there is no need for our map to be surjective, if is not hit by at all, then its pre-image is empty and so we are okay).
If is bijective, and both are continuous, then is a topological isomorphism (called "Homeomorphism")
Given three topological spaces , if are both continuous, then is continuous. For all , . Hence .
if is a continuous map, let if we put the subspace topology (inheriting from ) on , then the restriction is continuous. let be any open set of . . Since is open in , by the definition of the subspace topology, is open in .