prelude - Topology

Topological space

A set X and a collection of subsets of X, (called open sets) T is a topogical space if:

  • ,XT
  • if AαT is an arbitrary collection of open sets, for each αI (where I is any index set), αIAαT. That is, arbitrary union of open sets, is open.
  • Similarly, for a finite collection of open sets AiT, the intersection i=1nAiT. That is, finite intersection of open sets are open.

Note: for a topological space (X,T), Saying A is open is equivalent to saying AT. So we might simply use open sets to refer to the (sub)sets in the topology T. It is important to note that the concept of "open sets" is therefore dependent on the choice of topology T on X.
Moreover, for a point pX we say that U is an open set around p if pU. This is just to help write more intuitive sentences.

Neighborhood

Given a topological space (X,T), and a point pX, then V is a neighborhood around p if There is an open set U around p that is contained in V. More formally, V is a neighborhood if pUVX, where UT. The set of all neighborhoods of p is denoted as N(p)

Limit point

let (X,T) be a topological space and SX. then a point pX is a limit point of S if for all neighborhoods V around p, V has a non empty intersection with S, and contains points other than p. That is, for all VN(p), (Vp)S.
The set of all limit points of S is denoted as LP(S)

Closed Set

Let (X,T) be a topological and SX. Then S is closed if it contains all it's limit points. That is, LP(S)S.

CLOSED AND OPEN ARE NOT OPPOSITES!!!!

  • This is something important to keep in mind. If a set is not closed, that doesn't mean its open. And if a set is not open, it doesn't mean that it is closed. It's a weird case of English names not playing well with their co-responding math definitions.
  • For example, if (X,T) is a topological space, then X is open by definition (XT), However, X also contains all its limit points (X contains all points!) Hence X is also closed. It is both closed and open, or "clopen" (this is an actual term).
  • Define the standard toplogy on R where the open sets are unions of open intervals (a,b). consider the set S=(0,1]. Clearly this set is not open, as no union of open intervals or finite intersection of open intervals can result in S. However, it is also not closed, as 0 is a limit point of S, but 0S. So this is an example of a set that neither close nor open in the standard topology on R.

Henceforth we may omit mentioning T and simply say X is a topological space, of course, T, a topology of X is still there.

Closure of a set

let X be a topological space and SX. Then the closure of S written S¯ is the union of S with all the limit points of S. That is, S¯=SLP(S).

The closure of a set is closed

Let X be a topological space, and SX. Then S¯=SLP(S) is closed.

proof:Suppose S is not closed. Then there exists a point q which is a limit point of S but not in S. Clearly, q is not a limit point of S. Therefore, q must be a limit point of LP(S). Take any open set U around q. There exists some pLP(S) such that (U{q}){p}. This means that pU, which implies that U is an open set around p. Since p is a limit point of S, this also means that U intersects (non-emptily and without p) with S. Therefore, q must be a limit point of S.


The closure is the smallest containing closed set

Let X be a topological space and SX. Then if E is a closed set such that SE, then S¯E. That is, any closed set that contains S must also contain it's closure.

proof: Since E is closed, E contains all it's limit points. In particular, E contains all the limit points of S because E contains S. Therefore E contains S¯.


Denseness

If X is a topological space, then AX is dense if A¯=X.
denseness of A is a nice property, because any point xX is either in A, or is a limit point of A.

Subspace Topology

Let (X,T) be a topological space and YX. Then inheriting the topology TY={UY:UT}, (basically taking the intersection of all open sets with Y) defines a topological space (Y,Ty). (It is left to the reader to verify that (YTy) satisfies the axioms of topology)

Covers and Subcovers

Let X be a topo space, and SX, then an open cover of S,is a collection of open sets C={Uα:αI} such that SαIUa.
If CC is also a cover of S, then C is a subcover of S. Note: subcover simply means picking some (maybe all) elements of the cover.

Compactness

let X be a topo space and SX. then S is compact if for every open cover C(S) There exists a subcover C(S)C(S) such that the cardinality of C is finite.

Metric space

a set X with a distance function d:XR+{0} is a metric space if:

  • d(x,y)=0x=y (only identical points have zero distance).
  • d(x,y)=d(y,x) (symmetry of distance).
  • d(x,z)+d(z,y)d(x,y) (triangle inequality).
Basis for a topology

let (X,T) be a topological space. Then, a basis of this topology BT for every point xX an open set U around x, there exists a "basic open set" BB such that xBU.
Essentially, the basis is a subcollection of open sets, such that any open set is the union of some basis elements. The elements of the basis are called basic open sets.

  • (B1) Since X is itself an open set, for every xX, there exists a basic open set B around x.
  • (B2) For any two basic open sets B1,B2 if xB1B2 There exists B3B1B2 around x. (this is because the (finite) intersections of open sets are open).
    In fact, if there is no topology on X, but we have a collection of subsets B for which (B1) and (B2) holds, Then we can generate a topology from arbitrary unions of elements of B. By induction on (B2) the generated topology is stable under finite intersection, and by (B1) X is part of the generated topology. And by the process of generation, the generated topology is also stable under arbitrary unions.

On convergence:

Consider a set E as the domain of some set of functions, targeted towards a metric space (Y,d).
The sequence of functions f1,f2, converges to f pointwise, if for every ϵ>0 and xE, there exists N(x,ϵ)N such that for n>N(x,ϵ), d(fn(x),f(x))<ϵ.
The thing about pointwise convergence on E is that, the tail of the sequence that is epsilon close to f at an input x depends not only on epsilon but x as well.

On the other hand, f1,f2, uniformly converges to f if for any ϵ>0, there exists N(ϵ) such that no matter what choice of xE, whenever n>N(ϵ),
d(fn(x),f(x))<ϵ.

Compact convergence

let (X,T) be a toplogical space, (Y,d) a metric space, and XY the set of all functions from X to Y. A sequence of functions f1,f2, in XY converges compactly to f in XY if for every compact subset K of X, the restriction of each fn to K uniformly converges to the restriction of f to K. That is for any ϵ>0, there is N(ϵ)N such that whenever n>N(ϵ), for all xK, d(fn(x),f(x))<ϵ, for any compact subset K.

  • Since the inequality holds for all xK, we can say that supxK d(fn(x),f(x))>ϵ for all n>N(ϵ).
  • Stating the theorem compactly, for all compact KX, limnsupxK d(fn(x),f(x))=0

In some sense, We want to put a topology on {#X} Y such that if fnf (that is the sequence fn converges to f, both in XY as a topological space) if and only if fn compactly converges to f.

Take any compact set CX, any ϵ>0 and f \in \ { #XY} . Define the open ball \ Basis element: $$B_C(f, \epsilon) = { g \in

{ #XY}
: \sup_{x \in C} \ d(f(x),g(x)) < \epsilon}$$

Then, using κX to denote all compact subsets of X, $$\mathscr B = \bigcup_{C \in \kappa X} \ \bigcup_{\epsilon > 0} \ \bigcup_{f \in
{ #XY}
} \ B_{C}(f,\epsilon)$$

We now have to verify that B is a basis, by (B1) and (B2).
So (B1) basically states (in this context) that for each f \in \ { #XY} there exists BB such that fB.
well, pick any compact C and ϵ>0.
Clearly BC(f,ϵ)B, and fBC(f,ϵ) as d(f(x),f(x))=0<ϵ.

Lemma

If gBC(f,ϵ) and δc=ϵsupxC d(f(x),g(x)) then BC(g,δc)Bc(f,ϵ).
proof: let hBc(g,δc), then supxC d(h(x),g(x))<ϵsupxC d(g(x),f(x)). Rearrange and use triangle inequality to get supxC d(h(x),g(x))<ϵ.

let hBC(f,ϵ)BD(t,υ) as defined in the lemma, BC(h,δC)BC(f,ϵ) and BD(h,δD)BD(g,υ). It follows that BCD(h,min(δC,δD))BC(f,ϵ)BD(t,υ) and contains h. (C,D are compact so CD is compact). Finally showing (B2).

Okay back to fucking reality. We have put a topology on XY. But what does convergence in a topological space mean?

Convergence of sequences in topological spaces

A sequence xn converges to x (written xnx) in a topological space X if for every nbhd V around x, there exists N(V)N such that for all n>N(V) xnV.
Equivalently xnx if and only if for each basis element B around x there exists N(B)N such that for all n>N(B) xnB.
proof: if V is a nbhd of x, then there is an open set U where xUV. But U is the union of some basis elements, one of them has to contain x, call it B. So it's sufficient to show that there is a tail of the sequence contained in B.
But all Basis elements B around x are themselves nbhd's around x. so it is necessary to show that there is a tail of the sequence contained in any such B.

Compact convergence topology

Let (X,T) be a topological space and (Y,d) be a metric space. The compact convergence topology on function from X to Y, XY is the one generated by the following basis set:

\mathscr B = \bigcup_{C \in \kappa X} \ \bigcup_{\epsilon > 0} \ \bigcup_{f \in \ { #XY} } \ B_{C}(f,\epsilon)

Where

B_C(f, \epsilon) = \{ g \in \ {#XY} : \sup_{x \in C} \ d(f(x),g(x)) < \epsilon\}

And in this topology on XY fnf if and only if fn converges compactly to f. This follows directly by considering any basis B=BC(g,δ) that contains f.
We must have N(B) such that for all n>N(B)
fnB, equivalently, supxCd(fn(x),g(x))<δ. Hence, supxCd(fn(x),g(x))+supxCd(g(x),f(x))<2δ. using the triangle inequality and properties of sup, we get supxCd(fn(x),f(x))<2δ=ϵ. Notice here that C is any compact set and ϵ>0 is also arbitrary.

Alternate definition for closed sets

Let X be a topological space. Then EX is closed if and only if XE is open.
Well suppose E is closed, then any limit point of E is in E. Therefore, no point pXE is a limit point of E. Hence, for each pXE There exists a NBHD Vp around p such that VpE=. Equivalently, There exists an open set Up around each p such that UpE=. Hence pXEUp=XE. Hence XE is open (it is a union of open sets).
Now suppose XE is open, and (for the sake of contradiction) suppose qXE is a limit point of E. Write XE=αIBα as a union of some collection of basis elements. By the axiom of choice, q is in some Bα But since q is a limit point of E, Bα contains some point eqE. This means that eαIBα, which means that eXE, which is a contradiction. Hence no point qXE is a limit point of E, therefore E contains all its limit points (E is closed)

  • Note: whenever we have a definition of something, A := B iff ("def 1"), and then we also have A := B iff ("some condition") we can alternatively take that condition itself as a definition, and recover the older definition as a theorem instead. That is to say, if we define closed sets as ones that contain all their limit points, we can show the theorem: E is closed iff its complement in X is open. Dually, we can define E is closed iff its complement in X is open, and recover E is closed iff it contains all its limit points as a theorem
Continuous maps on topological spaces

let X,ΘX and Y,ΘY be topological spaces. A map f:XY is a homomorphism (continuous) if for any open subset VΘY of Y, the pre image of V, f1(V) is open in X, that is f1(V)ΘX (note that since is always open in any topology, there is no need for our map to be surjective, if V is not hit by f at all, then its pre-image is empty and so we are okay).
If f:XY is bijective, and both f,f1 are continuous, then f is a topological isomorphism (called "Homeomorphism")

  • Given three topological spaces X,Y,Z, if f:XY, g:YZ are both continuous, then gf:XZ is continuous. For all VZΘZ, g1(VZ)ΘY. Hence f1(g1(ΘZ))ΘX.
  • if f:XY is a continuous map, let SX if we put the subspace topology (inheriting from ΘX) on S, then the restriction f|S:SY is continuous. let V be any open set of Y. f1|S(V)=f1(V)S. Since f1(V) is open in X, by the definition of the subspace topology, f1(V)S is open in S.