let be groups and be a map. is a group homomorphism if for each , .
furthermore, we will suppress any notation to indicate that is a product in and is a product in .
Properties of homomorphisms
For the following discussion, let be groups, with identities and and a homomorphism from .
(under a homomorphism, the image of the identity of the domain group, is the identity of the target group).
for each , is where is the inverse in .
Let all be groups, and let be a homomorphism from to , a homomorphism from to , then is a homomorphism from to .(the composition of homomorphisms, is itself a homomorphism).
![[diagram-20240712 (1).svg#invert_B]]
Notice that for any , but . Therefore, Hence is the unique inverse of in . In notation, .
let be arbitrary elements of . Then, .
\end{proof}
Group isomorphism
let , be groups. a map is an isomorphism, if it is a bijective homomorphism. An isomorphism from onto itself is called an automorphism.
The inverse of an isomorphism is an isomorphism
if is an isomorphism, then is an isomorphism, where are groups.
\begin{proof}
The inverse of a bijection, is also a bijection. Hence, it is sufficient to prove that is a homomorphism. let be arbitrary elements of . Then, since is bijective, there exists unique such that . hence . Now, . Hence is a homomorphism.
\end{proof}
The collection of all automorphisms on a group, is itself a group
Let be a group, and let be the collection of all automorphisms on . Then this set, with map composition as the operator, forms a group.
\begin{proof}
notice that the identity map from to is an automorphism (it is both bijective and homomorphic). And acts as the group identity under composition. for any two maps . Then is bijective, moreover due to [[#^3f5f3f]] is a homomorphism, hence . Associativity follows as a property of function composition, and due to [[#^e12bc0]], for each , : the inverse map, acts as the group inverse element. \end{proof}
The left coset map:
left coset maps on a group
Let be a group, and an arbitrary element of . then the left coset map is the map for each .
left coset maps are bijective
Let be a group, and be the collection of left coset maps from to . Then, every element is a bijection on .
\begin{proof}
Let be an arbitrary element of . We claim that is a bijection. suppose for , . Then, hence , showing injectivity.
Now, suppose is an arbitrary element in . Notice that . Showing Surjectivity.
\end{proof}
the collection of left coset maps, is a group
Let be a group, then the collection of left coset maps is a group under map composition. Moreover, is isomorphic to .
\begin{proof}
The identity map on is for all , is the group identity as for any . Associativity follows as a property of map composition, of course, the composition of two left coset maps . is , because for all . Hence, is closed under composition, moreover the map is a homomorphism, as .
For each the unique is given by . This is because for each , . Hence .
We claim that the map is bijective. Surjectivity is obvious. now suppose that then for each , hence . Hence we produce the desired isomorphism from to ).
\end{proof}
two distinct left coset maps never agree on the image of a particular element.
Let be a group, and be two distinct left coset maps. Then there is no such that
Otherwise, this would imply that hence (multiplying on both the sides), meaning that and are identical maps.